perm filename CARDEF.ESS[ESS,JMC] blob
sn#151936 filedate 1975-03-26 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 AUTOMOBILES AND STANFORD
C00007 ENDMK
Cā;
AUTOMOBILES AND STANFORD
Hitchhiking Si! Car pooling No!
Everyone who thinks about people commuting to work wonders
why there isn't more car pooling. The advantages are the saving in
gas expenses and sharing the work of driving. The advantages can be
made somewhat larger by favoring car pooling in allocation of parking
spaces and in bridge lanes and bridge tolls.
However, the amount of car pooling has reduced with time.
The car pools formed when gas was rationed in World War II broke up
quickly as soon as rationing ended. There is a certain residual
level of car pooling, but it has probably been decreasing. Advocates
of car pooling often propose various measures that they hope will
increase its use. Positive measures proposed include computer aids
for finding car pooling partners and various kinds of favoritism for
car pools, and negative measures include restricting the parking
privileges of those who don't conform.
The motives of those who want to encourage car pooling are
social. They want to reduce traffic, to reduce the requirements for
parking, and to reduce the use of energy either because they believe
there is a short or long term crisis or because the see the
individual automobile as unesthetically inefficient.
Well, if so many people have ignored the advantages of car
pooling for such a long time, perhaps there are some disadvantages.
Here are some that I can think of:
1. The major disadvantage is that a car pool commits one to
fixed hours of going to work and returning home. Committed to a car
pool, you cannot run errands on the way home or go somewhere else
entirely from work or come to work early or late. This is
particularly acute when one is committed to drive. I suspect this is
the main reason.
2. The disadvantage that the commuting journey is lengthened
by the need to pick up others is probably lesser. It depends on
ratio of the local distances to the long distance commute.
Associated with it is the fact that meeting a schedule requires
allowing extra time for contingencies.
The most successful car pools today are those associated with
chauffering children to private schools or other events. These work,
because they genuinely save labor and increasee the participants
flexibility.
In general, it seems that people will pay a very large price
for the ability to schedule their activities flexibly. In fact, it
can be argued that a large fraction of the American increased
productivity since 1900 has been expended on getting out of fixed
living and commuting arrangements, and a large part of the demand for
further improvements in living and working conditions is precisely a
demand for even greater flexibility. If this is true than the idea
of encouraging car pooling is simply tilting at windmills.